As part of the GEMNET/GIST Fall issue on Human Rights, GEM interviewed Bella Abzug,
President of Womens Environment and Development Organization (WEDO). Ms. Abzug is a
former U.S. Congresswoman from New York and is a well known activist for human rights.
Ciao, Bella: My 1600 days with Bella Abzug by Susan Davis.
Summary
GEM: (1) What do
you see as the future
for young women?
Ms. Abzug: Women will run
the 21st century. The new
millennium has to have
significant change. We can't
continue the errors of the past,
which have been created
largely by one part of the
population. This is going to be
the women's century, and
young people are going to be
its leaders.
GEM: (2) What will it
take to get women to
that point?
Ms. Abzug (full text, #2):
The way I look at the
world--it's suffering a global
nervous breakdown. Part of
the reason why there is all this
imbalance--the division
between the rich and poor,
which is widening--is the
imbalance in decision making.
I think it's very difficult for
one part of the population to make decisions, particularly for life and death--for all parts of the
population. The decision makers have largely all been male, and this has been the bloodiest
century we've ever had--wars, violence, rape, internal wars all over the world. It's really
unacceptable.
How to we intend to [make a change]? We're building a women's movement, and we've been
making it larger and larger. It's world wide. It's where it's never been before.
GEM: (3) Why is it that women and what they can contribute are so
undervalued in the world today?
Ms. Abzug (full text, #3): Well, it's a long history of a long culture [The culture has seen
women] as a subordinate group that are around to take care of the house and the kids and that's
all. That isn't the way it is any more with women. Women are mothers as well as workers in the
economies of countries all over the world. The laws and the cultures developed under entirely
different conditions when women didn't work outside and were almost considered property of
males. The families in some cultures--as well as the husbands--are going to have to be changed.
And that's a process that's very, very hard.
GEM: (4) You've always worked to empower the powerless. Is your
interest in the environment a new direction or another part of the
original?
Ms. Abzug (full text, #4): The environment is key. When I read about the Earth Summit of
1992, I was shocked to see that there were only a couple of references to women because women
are the managers of environment and development. And we believe that the continuance of the
earth and the maintenance of its health is fundamental to life itself. So environment becomes a
very key question.
You see, women are no longer interested just in what we call "women's issues." We've been
mainstreamed. And because we were not allowed to really develop policy with respect to most
issues, we're not wedded to the false policies of the past, the policies that have failed.
Women's Environment and Development Organization is very engaged in women's
health--breast cancer, for instance. Breast cancer is every woman's nightmare and one 1 of 8
women's reality. We're having one of the first world conferences on environment in Canada
with the Canadian Kingston Breast Cancer Group. It's July 13-17 in Kingston. We're looking
for money and support. There will be lay people, governments, scientists--everybody.
GEM: (5) Differences in age, culture, and economic status surely
must affect women's needs and the ways that they are prepared to
join forces. Is there a likelihood of factions forming and hurting
progress?
Ms. Abzug (full text, #5): There are always differences. There are always diverse points of
view. But you'd be surprised. One thing I can tell you, having worked in a man's world,
essentially for most of my adult life. [Women reach] consensus pretty quickly. Do you know
why women can agree more quickly, though we come from different classes and cultures and
geographies? --Because no matter where we are, no matter what country, what economic
division we're in, what race, what cultural background, women are still, still the victims of
discrimination of those who control power.
GEM: (6) In the U. S., is campaign finance reform important to
your goals? If so, please explain the connection.
Ms. Abzug: If women don't insist an a whole new change in campaign finance reform, they're
not going to get the changes of their own personal participation in greater numbers because the
campaign finances are not only an obscenity but make it impossible for most people to run. So
it's a very big issue affecting women candidates, women in politics, and women's programs,
and women's agendas.
GEM: (7) How can international trade help the plight of women in
countries that are developing economically and industrially?
Ms. Abzug (full text, #7): So far it hasn't been too helpful because, you see, the elimination of
trade barriers in some instances has created jobs and so on, but in other instances it has created a
free trade with no barriers and no commitments to women themselves or to labor. So it has its
pluses and its minuses.
GEM: (8) Could those problems be fixed by some other approach?
Ms. Abzug (full text, #8): Well, we haven't had real enlightened thinking in government for a
long time. These problems have to be fixed by having governments and people realize that there
are human priorities that have to be dealt with.
I mean there's over a billion people who hunger every day in the world. If we had a 5% cut in
the military budget, it would be a banquet for the world's poor--just a 5% cut. This is the
post-cold-war era, and thinking has not changed sufficiently as to how to create a world that is
significantly at peace. So I think that you've got to have the right people to do it. We don't, at
the moment, in either party--Democrat or Republican. The Democrats have moved more and
more to the center, and the Republicans have moved more and more to the right. None of that is
improving the lives of most people. That's regrettable.
GEM: (9) Ms. Abzug, thank you very much. Any closing remarks?
Ms. Abzug (full text, #9): You can't continue to have a world without equal participation of
men and women. That's my central thesis.
Sometimes I say that it's not that I think women are superior to men, it's just that we've had so
little opportunity to be corrupted by power. And I jokingly add sometimes that we want that
opportunity.